Entries by kimjordahl

Examiner reversed, reminded that claims “must be read in accordance with the precepts of English grammar”

With a Federal Circuit citation, no less. In Ex parte Moffat, USSN 15/227,827, the claims on appeal were directed to toner compositions with white colorants.  Independent claim 1 recited, in pertinent part:  An emulsion aggregation toner having toner particles comprising … one single white colorant consisting of titanium dioxide… While claim 21, dependent from claim […]

Motivation to combine is not present when benefit alleged to be provided by the combination is already present in the art

Wait … what? This argument came up and prevailed – twice – in Tech Center 1700 PTAB decisions in November. First, Ex parte Gama, US Patent Application No 12/042641, Appeal 2019-002094, decided November 5, 2019.  In Gama, the Examiner found claims directed to a fuel filter obvious over two references.  The motivation to combine, the […]

Examiner reversed for relying on “common sense” to supply claim recitation missing from the applied art

Applicants/Appellants in the food arts, rejoice! In Ex parte Elejalde, US Patent Application Serial No. 14/119,935, Appeal 2019-003528 decided November 21, 2019 (Ex parte Elejalde), the claims recite a pan coating process using two drums.  A liquid is taught to be applied in the first drum, and a powder applied in the second such that […]

Non-Analogous Art Argument WINS!!!

Not once, not twice, but FIVE times at PTAB, Tech Center 1700, in November and December. Full disclosure – four of the decisions were issued in related applications. In Ex parte Hansen et al.,  US Patent Application Serial No. 12/345215, Appeal 2019-001796, decided November 14, 2019 Ex parte Hansen and Ex parte Hansen et al., […]

PTAB Tech Center 1700 Observations, November 2019

Examiner’s in Tech Center 1700 had a reversal rate of about 40% in November, giving patent prosecutors and applicants alike something to be grateful for: The Board heard 86 appeals, and reversed the Examiner 34 times: Oral hearing was held 11 times.  In 8 instances, the Examiner was affirmed and in 3, the Examiner was […]

PTAB reverses Examiner on “overlapping ranges” rejection

Ex parte Sobota, decided November 27, 2019.  Ex parte Sobota PTAB Decision  Claim 11 of US Patent Application No. 14/907,957, the subject of this appeal, recites: 11.  A process for preparing trichlorosilane (TCS), comprising reacting metallurgical silicon (mg-Si) having a titanium content of 0.08 wt% to 0.12 wt.%, and a phosphorus content ≥ 30 ppmw […]

A cautionary tale for use of “the present invention” – Techtronic Industries, LTD v. ITC

My first thought when reading this case was doesn’t anyone else have a garage door that will not close even when there is nothing in the way?  Or that goes on psychotic ‘opening and closing’ benders for no apparent reason?  I can’t be the only one – clearly improved garage door openers are needed in […]

Come as you are – so long as you aren’t wearing a t-shirt that infringes my logo

Nirana’s lawsuit for copyright and trademark infringement against Marc Jacobs International LLC (and others) has been allowed to continue.  On November 8, 2019, a Federal Judge denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the claims, regarding Nirvana’s “smiley face” logo, created by Kurt Cobain in 1991.  Nirvana v Marc Jacobs The Court conducted a review of defendant’s […]